Just when Africa’s luck was changing ..

KIGALI, Rwanda — Two years ago, when Dubai World said it would invest $230 million in Rwandan tourism, officials here rejoiced.

Among the many projects the company trumpeted were a sprawling luxury hotel on the 18-hole golf course here and an eco-lodge in the Akagera National Park, a swampy grassland farther northeast where herds of elephants and water buffalo roam.

In an interview at his offices in Kigali last fall, Rwanda’s president, Paul Kagame, cited the Dubai investment as one of many that his small East African country had managed to attract in its effort to reduce its dependence on aid in favor of private investments.

But just last month, Dubai World scaled back its ambitious investment plans, its coffers strained by the global financial crisis. The company says it will go forward with only two of the eight projects it had planned in Rwanda, and the Kigali hotel and Akagera eco-lodge didn’t survive.

“The scaling back of foreign investments like Dubai World certainly impacts the things that the government of Rwanda wants to do in terms of raising the standards of living for all Rwandans,” said Clare Akamanzi, an executive with the Rwanda Development Board. “It was a major deal for us because tourism is a big part of our economy, and investments in that sector are what we need.”

When the credit crisis erupted in September, many experts thought that Africa would be spared the financial turmoil of the American and European financial systems, because African banks had almost none of their assets tied up in the global subprime market.

But it has recently become clear that Africa is being hit hard. The World Bank estimates that its economies will grow an average of 3 percent this year, compared with an annual average of 6 percent from 2004 to 2008.

“The crisis could not have come at a worse time,” said Jose Gijon, chief Africa economist at the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, based in Paris. “Before the meltdown, many African countries had made significant progress in attracting foreign investment and private capital, and this could derail those efforts.”

Many investment projects have either been delayed or canceled as credit has dried up, according to the African Development Bank. A project in Tunisia between British Gas and ETAP, the Tunisian national oil company, fell apart because the financing did not materialize. And Congo, which expected $2.4 billion in foreign investment this year, now anticipates about $600 million.

Continentwide figures for foreign direct investment so far this year are not available. But in the sub-Saharan African countries, the International Monetary Fund estimates, foreign direct investment will drop roughly 18 percent in 2009 from about $30 billion in 2008.

“The decline in investment will reduce the ability of African governments to fund health, education, infrastructure and nutrition programs,” said Leonce Ndikumana, director of the development research department at the African Development Bank.

Organizations like the development bank have stepped up their efforts to limit the impact of the credit crisis. But many fear that the moves will not be enough. The World Bank said recently that international financial institutions by themselves could not currently cover the shortfall in capital and investments to emerging-market countries.

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the amount of private investment going to Africa had begun to outpace aid. M. Nathaniel Barnes, Liberia’s ambassador to the United States and the country’s former finance minister, says that while foreign aid is still crucial for African countries, it usually focuses on humanitarian issues like emergency food and shelter or medical supplies. In contrast, he said, foreign investment provides long-term sustainability and growth.

“Instead of talking to USAID, I’d rather be talking to a company like Nike,” Barnes said. “Having a partner like that means jobs and economic growth, and you just don’t get that from aid.”

Not everyone sees foreign investment as the way to solve the many problems facing African countries.

While acknowledging that foreign direct investments have contributed to sustained growth, Emira Woods, a native of Liberia and co-director of Foreign Policy in Focus, a publication at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, says the benefits do not always trickle down to the local populations. She notes that significant numbers of people are still trapped in poverty in countries like Nigeria and Angola, two of the top recipients of investments.

Most of the foreign direct investment in those countries is in “extractive industries” like oil, gas, or metals, she says, rather than in infrastructure. “Minerals and goods are put on a ship or plane and sent out of the country so the people there don’t really benefit,” she said.

“It’s hard to find good examples where foreign direct investment is leading to real concrete development.”

In 2007, more than $53 billion in foreign direct investments flowed into Africa, up from $9 billion in 2000, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. The estimate for 2008 is more than $72 billion. And according to a United Nations report, investments in Africa had the highest rate of return of all developing regions in 2006 and 2007.

“For the most part, these are new markets that need everything, and there is little or no competition,” said Bruce J. Wrobel, the president of Sithe Global, an energy company that is based in New York and controlled by the Blackstone Group.

Sithe and the Aga Khan Group, a private international development organization, have joined to build a huge hydroelectric dam in Jinja, Uganda, which is expected to cost $860 million. The project is one of the largest infrastructure projects in Africa. It’s also one of the largest private foreign investments on the continent.

Projects like the dam provide a perfect example of why private investment is needed in African countries, says Barnes, the Liberian official. Not only do they hire people to do construction work, they also help to create hundreds of other jobs as new service businesses spring up.

1,000 people from Jinja and surrounding areas have been hired to work at the dam site in various jobs. Some do basic construction work — like crushing stones from the river bottom into cement; others are drivers, cultural liaisons and lower-level managers.

Many of the top officials on the project, like Kenneth Keheru, deputy construction manager, are native Ugandans.

“What’s also good about projects like this is they provide local workers with the necessary skills,” Keheru says. “So when others begin to invest, they don’t have to train a work force. There is already one in place.”

And even some people who were forced to relocate say they have benefited from new housing and water supplies and better schools and health facilities. For instance, some locals who previously lived in mud huts have moved into sturdy cinderblock homes.

When it is finished, the dam will provide some much-needed power to a country where only 5 percent of homes have access to electricity.

China, which has become a major investor and trading partner for Africa, continues to invest. The China-Africa Development Fund, which has invested nearly $400 million in projects in Africa, said it planned to raise an additional $2 billion by November. African groups are also continuing to pump money into projects ranging from telecommunications to new oil fields.lems facing African countries.While acknowledging that foreign direct investments have contributed to sustained growth, Emira Woods, a native of Liberia and co-director of Foreign Policy in Focus, a publication at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, says the benefits do not always trickle down to the local populations. She notes that significant numbers of people are still trapped in poverty in countries like Nigeria and Angola, two of the top recipients of investments.Most of the foreign direct investment in those countries is in “extractive industries” like oil, gas, or metals, she says, rather than in infrastructure. “Minerals and goods are put on a ship or plane and sent out of the country so the people there don’t really benefit,” she said.”It’s hard to find good examples where foreign direct investment is leading to real concrete development.”In 2007, more than $53 billion in foreign direct investments flowed into Africa, up from $9 billion in 2000, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. The estimate for 2008 is more than $72 billion. And according to a United Nations report, investments in Africa had the highest rate of return of all developing regions in 2006 and 2007.”For the most part, these are new markets that need everything, and there is little or no competition,” said Bruce J. Wrobel, the president of Sithe Global, an energy company that is based in New York and controlled by the Blackstone Group.Sithe and the Aga Khan Group, a private international development organization, have joined to build a huge hydroelectric dam in Jinja, Uganda, which is expected to cost $860 million. The project is one of the largest infrastructure projects in Africa. It’s also one of the largest private foreign investments on the continent.Projects like the dam provide a perfect example of why private investment is needed in African countries, says Barnes, the Liberian official. Not only do they hire people to do construction work, they also help to create hundreds of other jobs as new service businesses spring up.1,000 people from Jinja and surrounding areas have been hired to work at the dam site in various jobs. Some do basic construction work — like crushing stones from the river bottom into cement; others are drivers, cultural liaisons and lower-level managers.Many of the top officials on the project, like Kenneth Keheru, deputy construction manager, are native Ugandans.”What’s also good about projects like this is they provide local workers with the necessary skills,” Keheru says. “So when others begin to invest, they don’t have to train a work force. There is already one in place.”And even some people who were forced to relocate say they have benefited from new housing and water supplies and better schools and health facilities. For instance, some locals who previously lived in mud huts have moved into sturdy cinderblock homes.When it is finished, the dam will provide some much-needed power to a country where only 5 percent of homes have access to electricity.China, which has become a major investor and trading partner for Africa, continues to invest. The China-Africa Development Fund, which has invested nearly $400 million in projects in Africa, said it planned to raise an additional $2 billion by November. African groups are also continuing to pump money into projects ranging from telecommunications to new oil fields.

0
0

NO COMMENTS