American visitor to Brac had loaded gun

Pilot fined $8,000, conviction recorded

The Courthouse Building in downtown George Town. – photo: Taneos Ramsay

An American visitor who flew his own plane to Cayman Brac last week ended up staying in the jurisdiction longer than planned after a loaded revolver was found in his flight bag.

Paul Arthur Grenier, 54, appeared in Summary Court on Wednesday afternoon, when he pleaded guilty to possession of an unlicensed .22 Magnum revolver and 10 rounds of live ammunition at Charles Kirkconnell International Airport on Jan. 19.

Defense attorney Jonathon Hughes told Magistrate Angelyn Hernandez that Grenier has a firearms license in his home state of Georgia. He carried the gun as part of his flying gear out of a genuine concern that the aircraft could be subject to being hijacked.

The gun was never an issue in the United States, Mr. Hughes pointed out, and the defendant’s trips outside the U.S. were rare. This trip to the Brac was with friends for diving.

After hearing the facts and further mitigation, the magistrate accepted that there were exceptional circumstances (which meant that the mandatory minimum sentence of seven years’ imprisonment did not have to be imposed). She fined Grenier $8,000 and recorded a conviction against him after pointing out that this was a lenient sentence for a serious offense. She also ordered that the gun and ammunition be forfeited.

The magistrate commented that Grenier probably wanted to get back to the Brac, get his plane and go home. The defendant agreed, acknowledging to the court that he was “scared to death.”

Crown counsel Scott Wainwright provided a summary of facts. He said Grenier was attempting to go to his aircraft around 10 a.m. and informed officers of his intention when he reached the airport security screening area. He was told his bag would have to be examined and at this stage he told officers he had a weapon.

When questioned, he said it was a firearm. He also stated that he did not see anywhere on the form to declare it when he arrived. A supervisor was called; the bag was screened through X-ray and the image of a firearm was observed.

Grenier and his bag were turned over to a customs officer. Asked if he had a firearm import license, Grenier said no, but he produced his Georgia license.

The bag was opened and a black cloth bag was revealed. It contained the revolver and five rounds of ammunition wrapped in plastic, plus another five rounds in the revolver. Grenier was cautioned and arrested. His aircraft was searched, but no prohibited or restricted goods were recovered.

Transported to the Creek Police Station, Grenier opted to give an interview without an attorney present. He said he had forgotten the revolver was in his bag until he got to the security checkpoint, where he indicated he had it in his bag.

He was granted bail with a cash surety in the sum of $2,500 and his travel documents were surrendered. He was directed to report to the Detention Center in George Town on Jan. 25 at 10 a.m.

Mr. Hughes took up the account from that point. He explained that Grenier arrived in Grand Cayman aboard a commercial flight and walked with his luggage from the airport to the detention center, where he subsequently made contact with Mr. Hughes.

In court, the attorney pointed out that his client’s gun was legal and only became illegal when it crossed the border. He suggested that Cayman’s Firearm Law was meant to protect the public from unlicensed guns held by people with illegal intentions.

Grenier was a responsible citizen, a senior vice president of a large construction company and a family man.

As to the question of having anything to declare on arrival, he had been thinking of things like seeds, food or alcohol. He had not realized how serious the matter of the firearm was.

Mr. Hughes noted that visitors found with bullets in their luggage typically are ordered to pay costs and they have no conviction recorded against them. He requested a similar disposal for Grenier.

The magistrate found that there were exceptional circumstances affecting sentence, but said the matter was too serious for her even to consider not recording a conviction. She also directed that the fine be paid before Grenier could return to the Brac to access his plane.

If you value our service, if you have turned to us in the past few days or weeks for verified, factual updates, if you have watched our live streaming of press conferences or sent an article to a friend... please consider a donation. Quality local journalism was at risk before the coronavirus crisis. It is now deeply threatened. Even a small amount can go a long way to sustaining our mission of informing the public. We need our readers’ financial support now more than ever.



  1. I really think that the government need to be more understanding to these kind of situations , and why don’t tourist get a “first-time” warning and put that in the Immigration data base for the next time that tourist return to the Islands .

    But just look at what this has caused the Brac economy to lose . The man own his own plane , he brought say 10 off his friends, they were going to dive for 3- 4 day , eat , and sleep , and drink and have a good time . I am sure that their trip was turned upside down when one of them were arrested and had to pay that big fine .

    About putting that on his record , I think that would be like one time I needed a hand held vhf for my business , I aplyed for a license they refused saying lack of explanation, I had my lawyer help me resubmit application , then I waited and no reply so then I just went on using it til I was caught , then I was charged with the one and only criminal offence on my record , and the first time I went to the USA the Immigration ask me what is that and laughed and sent me on my way .

    • Totally agree Ron.
      While he DID break the law he did so unknowingly and without criminal intent.

      At the least there should be a prominent warning when you enter our country warning people to hand over any weapons in their possession for collection when they leave.

  2. The only thing in danger of being hijacked in this case is our law. This man should have been imprisoned at least for a year instead of being given a slap on the wrist.This is an extremely serious case, as bad as it gets, and it’s time Americans realise that only their country operates like the Wild West.

  3. I am sure this gentleman is a standup citizen in his country and had no bad intentions. However these days people traveling around the world surely are aware of restrictions and different laws might apply. I do not see how someone that has a license to carry a weapon in his state / province or country assumes it will be okay to do so everywhere.
    Anyone traveling abroad these days knows you must check before you travel for visa requirements, legal substances, vegetables and the like. Even if you belong to a gun totting country like the USA, you surely are aware that restrictions may apply in a different place. I agree that his tourist dollars are welcome (and his friends) but that does not mean we can bypass the laws.