Bulk fuel depot proposed for Breakers

The developer behind a planned golf resort in the eastern districts is now seeking to bring a new bulk fuel storage facility to Grand Cayman.

Port Breakers, a new sister company to Ironwood, and Texas-based energy company Navasota Energy Services say they have acquired a plot of land in the Breakers area, previously earmarked by Dart Real Estate as the proposed location for a new landfill site. Dart is not directly involved in the fuel storage project.

Navasota and Ironwood are involved in a partnership that seeks to bring a massive fuel storage depot and terminal to Cayman, for transshipping fuel throughout the region.

As currently envisaged, the plan does not involve the construction of a port, but would service ships from offshore mooring buoys in a similar fashion to the existing terminal at Jackson Point, though significantly larger in scale.

Ironwood believes this will help pay for the East-West Arterial road extension, a 10-mile highway project considered pivotal to the long-term success of the golf resort.

Neither Navasota nor Ironwood is proposing to operate the facility. They will seek to acquire planning approvals and permits for the project before going out to bid for companies to build and operate the terminal.

Navasota CEO Frank Giacalone said his company would seek to find, through a request for proposals process, a major oil company that would run the facility, paying annual licensing fees to government.

He said it would be a business opportunity for the oil company.

“There are worldwide operators who are going to be interested in a facility like this for the western Caribbean,” he said. “The huge additional benefit is it gives you reserve fuel on the island and easy access to cheaper fuel.”

Outlining how the terminal would operate, Mr. Giacalone said it would be able to store fuel for the commodities futures markets, refuel large ocean-going ships and store and distribute fuel. He said it could also supply the local market.

“The majority of it would be fuel brought here in bulk and cut down and distributed to other areas in the region.”

David Moffitt, CEO of Ironwood, said the project was not linked to the golf resort, which has been granted planning permission but has not commenced. But he said it would help pay for the road extension.

He said the site designated for the fuel terminal was previously offered by Dart to government as a potential new landfill site.

“We have the land under contract – that is why we can make it public,” he said.

Lee Hudson, project manager on the Kimpton resort, now working with Ironwood, said the land had already undergone an environmental impact assessment for the landfill and was designated for industrial use. He accepted that there could be some opposition, given the backlash to plans for a landfill at the same site, but said he hoped it would be minimal.

He said the transshipment facility would be an entirely new revenue stream for government with the spin-off benefit of bringing cheaper fuel to consumers on island.

He said, “The fuel transshipment has the ability to provide a revenue stream that should the CIG choose, will pay for the road and provide revenue for an infrastructure fund for the island.

“You can’t do the transshipment, at least not for the local market, without the road. That is the piece of infrastructure that everybody at that end of the island is chomping at the bit to have.”

If you value our service, if you have turned to us in the past few days or weeks for verified, factual updates, if you have watched our live streaming of press conferences or sent an article to a friend... please consider a donation. Quality local journalism was at risk before the coronavirus crisis. It is now deeply threatened. Even a small amount can go a long way to sustaining our mission of informing the public. We need our readers’ financial support now more than ever.



  1. How exciting!
    Now that the existing fuel terminal on the western side of the island had been demonstrated to be very dangerous to those people living on that end, a new location has been suggested far away from that existing terminal.
    Oops…. only am I correct in saying the new terminal will not only be newer and bigger then the existing facility, put it could now receive super tankers and other huge tanker ships filled with crude oil (that thick black gunky stuff we see covering wildlife and sea shores in soap commercials) then chemically process the gunk making it fuel oil? If that is so, what will happen to the residuals left after the chemical reduction process? This is just one question after an initial read of this story. I wonder if there will be others that wonder if we are once again killing our environment for the sake of a few dollars and a nice highway?

  2. Mr Rodney Barnett if you were any closer I would kiss your feet for thinking so much faster ahead of everyone including the Government . They would have issued that license and approved those plans and never thought of what you’re pointing out . I am happy that everyone eyes could be opened to the possibilities .

  3. Cayman Compass , I am so fixed on believing what Mr. Rodney Barnett has pointed out in his comment would take place if that fuel terminal is approved.
    Cayman Compass can I please ask you if there’s anyway that you can put all Politicians in the Government and every Department that would be involved in the decisions of the Cayman Islands on PUBLIC RECORD of knowing what Rodny pointed out in his comment .
    I am scared that one day in the future Cayman would be covered in black gunk .

  4. Please tell me where it says that ships filled with crude oil will be coming here and then chemically processing the gunk making it fuel oil. It states that it would only be a fuel storage facility, not a refinery. Someone needs to read the whole article.