George Town MLA Ellio Solomon told the Caymanian Compass last week that a pension-for-property swap he proposed more than a year ago could come before the country’s Legislative Assembly as early as this month.
“I’ve been promised that it will be brought in September,” Mr. Solomon said.
The assembly is scheduled to begin meeting again on Wednesday and at press time the change that would allow people to withdraw money from their pension savings to use as a down payment on their primary residence had not been set in formal legislation.
Mr. Solomon and Bodden Town MLA Dwayne Seymour supported the proposal in a private members motion before the LA last year as a way to encourage first time Caymanian home-buyers to invest in property.
According to Mr. Solomon’s proposal – which would apply only to those with Caymanian Status – a person would be allowed to withdraw up to CI$35,000 from their local retirement savings account solely for the purpose of making a down payment on their homes or in purchasing a piece of property they could later build on.
Government Minister Rolston Anglin, who has responsibility for national pensions, acknowledged that many Caymanians do have difficulty in acquiring “capital for home ownership”. However, Mr. Anglin said at the time that careful consideration would have to be given to the details of the proposal which he applauded Messrs. Solomon and Seymour for making.
Mr. Solomon’s motion contemplated allowing both private sector and government employees to make the early withdrawal.
This concerned opposition MLA Kurt Tibbetts who wondered what would happen if some 1,000 civil servants wanted to take advantage of the plan and withdraw up to $35,000 for a down payment on a home or land. Mr. Tibbetts said such a take could mean a $35 million one-time hit to the public service pensions plan.
“If that fund were robbed of $35 million within any period of time … that fund would be in dire straits,” Mr. Tibbetts said.
Pension analysis
Desmond Kinch of Overseas Asset Management said last year that he would advise government to raise its current pension fund contribution rates for both the public and private sectors, if Mr. Solomon’s proposal was approved.
“Ellio’s idea would be good if it was combined with an increase in contribution rate; a requirement that any withdrawal from someone’s pension plan be used to buy a piece of land on which the person intends to build their principal residence or to buy their principal residence; and a further requirement that if someone sells that land or house and remains in the Cayman Islands, they have to either use the funds to buy another principal residence or deposit the funds back in their pension account,” Mr. Kinch said.
The issue, Mr. Kinch said, is how to keep someone’s retirement fund solvent if a temporary withdrawal is made.
“The problem with reducing the amount of savings available for retirement spending – if people can use funds in their retirement account to buy a property without topping up their account at the same time – is that you can’t take the equity in your house to the supermarket or use it to pay your CUC bill when you retire,” Mr. Kinch said.
A 2006 consultant’s report done on the Cayman Islands private sector pension systems identified that the current required contribution amount, 10 per cent of an individual’s salary (5 per cent paid by the employee and 5 per cent paid by the employer) is not enough in most cases to cover a person’s retirement.
Civil servants currently have a total of 12 per cent of their salaries paid into the Public Service Pensions Fund over and above what they receive in monthly emoluments.
The National Pensions Law allows individuals to contribute more to pensions if they wish, but their employer does not have to match those contributions beyond 5 per cent of salary.
Related Videos









Why should the only persons who benefit from this be Caymanians. There are many expatriates working here for a very long time who are seeing their pension contributions go down while they continue to spend the best years of their lives here working. How about we allow expatriates who have been contributing for a number of years access to a portion of their contributions in order to either invest it elsewhere or to buy property back home as well. The same requirements would be in place. You have to show that the funds are being used to purchase property in your own country.
The Dow is up 80 % from its lows …and when it was at the bottom you all decided you did not have to put any money it if you did not want to
Pension holiday is what you called it
You decided with your pension holiday option to mess up peoples retirements
To put it simply if you invested 100 at the bottom of the market it would have become 180 dollars today
That said your real estate market is about to collasp
and you are allowing a bunch of cheap homes to be built for people that cant afford a home.
.this is what happend in the US a few years ago and is still eating up the us economy
Letting people that dont know about money to access there pensions now will only lead to failure quickly The only way to own a home correctly is to save your money and then buy it.
This Idea of letting people access there pensions to buy a home is a sure failure and will destroy there retirements further.
Furthermore to the naysayers the interest you pay on your loan will eat up any money your leftover pension will be earning
In the end the government will love this because all those that end up loosing there home and there retirement income will be dependant on the government to take care of them and that is the goal of your government
Can you say socialist…
If part of a person’s pension fund is withdrawn to provide a lump sum to purchase property, presumably only the remainder in the person’s fund will benefit from the increases over time (and this could be a decade or two or more) due to investment by the fund managers? This will surely badly affect the eventual pension pot available on retirement?
It seems that the idea is based on the assumption that land and property values will rise significantly over time? And we know what has happened to that assumption on a very large scale in all developed economies since 2008. In the case of Cayman, that can only be assumed if the Government gets its finances in order, and the present crime situation is firmly and effectively dealt with.
I would welcome a clear statement on these points from the Minister of Finance or Mr Kinch, or the Financial Secretary, who may be, I think, responsible for the performance of the Fund.