When members of the Inmate Council at Northward Prison met with Compass Issues Editor James Whittaker inside HMP Northward, the intention was not simply to catalogue conditions or assign blame. It was to add context, lived experience and forward-looking solutions to a national conversation that has been brewing for years – and which the Compass reporting has rightly brought back into sharp focus.
The articles captured the physical reality of Northward with honesty: overcrowded wings,
condemned infrastructure, and staff working under relentless pressure in a system stretched beyond safe limits. That reality is not disputed. In fact, it was the starting point of our discussion.
What concerns us, however, is the risk that the public debate narrows too quickly around
where people are held, rather than what happens to them when they leave.
Infrastructure matters – but it is not the whole story
No one inside Northward questions the urgency of addressing overcrowding and safety. A
facility certified for 168 men and holding well over 230 presents undeniable risks. The
inability to properly separate remand prisoners, long-term inmates and individuals with acute mental-health needs is not theoretical – it is lived daily by inmates and staff alike.
These realities were shared candidly during our meeting and are reflected accurately in the
reporting. Any outlook for the prison system must prioritise safety and humane conditions.
But, as we emphasised during our discussion, even the most modern replacement facility will fall short if it is treated as the solution rather than one component of a much wider system.
We are having the wrong debate
Several council members raised a point during the visit that bears repeating in public: even if Cayman builds a new prison to the highest imaginable standard, the cycle will continue if
people are released without the support needed to live law-abiding lives.
The problem is not a lack of programmes inside Northward. Vocational training, City &
Guilds certifications, educational opportunities and structured work assignments exist – and many inmates engage seriously with them. For some, prison is the first place they earn a qualification, maintain a routine, or begin addressing untreated trauma and addiction.
The problem is what happens after release.
Too many individuals leave custody facing:
- no stable housing
- no clear pathway into employment
- no continuity of mental-health or substance-abuse care
- no practical support navigating probation, finances or family reintegration
As noted in the Compass reporting, some individuals return to the prison gate asking to be
taken back in – not because they prefer incarceration, but because the outside world offers
less structure, fewer services and no safety net.
That is not a failure of individual effort alone. It is a systemic failure of reentry support.
Spending more – and getting less
One issue raised during our meeting, and highlighted in the Compass coverage, deserves
greater public attention: the current cost per prisoner, approximately $90,000 per year.
As the Minister of Home Affairs has acknowledged, this figure does not reflect luxury or
indulgence. It reflects dysfunction. Ageing infrastructure bleeds money through excessive
water loss, inefficient electrical systems and constant emergency repairs required just to keep condemned buildings operational. The system pays a premium simply to stand still.
In other words, Cayman is spending tens of millions of dollars each year managing decay – not delivering outcomes.
From the perspective of those living inside the system, this raises a practical question: is this really the best use of public funds if the end result remains overcrowding, repeated
reoffending and ever-rising long-term costs?
Based on what we discussed during the visit, the answer is clearly no.
A more effective use of resources would be to redirect a meaningful portion of expenditure
beyond the prison fence — to the point at which crime is most often prevented or repeated.
From lived experience, inmates consistently identify the same gaps that lead people back into custody. Addressing them requires investment in:
Community officers deployed in the most vulnerable neighbourhoods in each
district, providing supervision, guidance and early intervention where risk is highest.
Expanded community-based drug rehabilitation and mental-health treatment,
ensuring continuity of care rather than abrupt withdrawal of services at release.
- Subsidised second-chance employment programmes, reducing the risk borne by
employers while allowing trained individuals to work. - Dedicated housing support through the Department of Financial Assistance, so
that release does not immediately become homelessness – a pathway that almost
guarantees reoffending.
These are not speculative ideas. They are proven, comparatively low-cost interventions that
directly reduce reoffending and stabilise prison populations over time.
The most expensive prisoner is the one who comes back
2 One theme emerged clearly from our discussions: the most expensive prisoner to the public purse is not the person receiving support – it is the one who returns.
Each preventable reoffence triggers a cascade of costs: new victims, policing, court
proceedings and incarceration. Against that reality, properly resourced community
rehabilitation is not a moral luxury – it is basic fiscal sense.
Continuing to spend $90,000 per inmate each year maintaining failing infrastructure, while
underfunding the modest supports required to keep people out of prison, locks the system into a cycle that grows more expensive and less effective with time.
Public safety depends on what happens after release
This is not an abstract policy debate. Under-resourcing reentry services is not a cost-saving
measure; it is one of the most expensive decisions a justice system can make.
We shared this perspective with James not as a complaint, but as a contribution. The Inmate Council believes that genuine public safety comes from fewer people returning to custody — not simply from expanding facilities to hold them.
A constructive way forward
The reporting has opened an important door. Our hope is that the conversation now expands beyond the prison walls.
Yes, Cayman must address overcrowding. Yes, infrastructure investment is unavoidable. But the long-term measure of success will not be how new a prison looks — it will be how many people never return to it.
That requires:
- properly resourced reentry and probation services
- employer partnerships linked directly to prison training
- continuity of mental-health and social services
- community-based supervision that supports accountability and stability
These are the themes we discussed during the visit, and this piece is offered in that same
spirit: not as a rebuttal, but as a continuation of a serious, necessary conversation.
The Inmate Council remains committed to working constructively with prison leadership,
policymakers, the media and the wider community. The challenges are real – but so are the opportunities to get this right.
By the Inmate Council, HMP Northward Prison
Related Videos
