Government will proceed with plans for a new cruise and cargo port in George Town harbour despite claims from campaigners that they have collected enough signatures to trigger a referendum on the project.

Premier Alden McLaughlin said government’s legal advice was that it “should not and need not” have any regard to the petition until it has been verified by the Elections Office and reaches Cabinet.

Even if that happens, the premier made no guarantees that a referendum would take place. He said his Cabinet would take the “appropriate and advised” course of action recommended by its legal team once the verified petition is submitted.

The Cruise Port Referendum Campaign announced last month that it had reached the 5,289 signatures, representing 25% of the electorate, required to trigger a people-initiated referendum on the port. The group said in a press statement Wednesday that representatives would meet with the Governor Friday before announcing the time and date that the petition will be submitted to the Elections Office.

McLaughlin, speaking in the Legislative Assembly on Wednesday, said the six-year planning and procurement process for the dock was reaching its endgame. He said the final bids had been received and a preferred bidder will be selected in the coming months.

At that point, the premier said, government would be able to share details on the cost, funding model and final design of the piers, which will be designed to accommodate larger cruise and cargo ships.

Questioned by Opposition Leader Arden McLean on how this process would be handled now that the referendum campaigners had supposedly reached their target, McLaughlin said, “The key word in that question is ‘supposedly.’ That summarises where that process is. Ten months after the petition was launched, there is still not even a list yet submitted to the Elections Office for verification.”

Historian and former Cabinet Minister Roy Bodden last week called for negotiations over the port to be put on pause until the verification process is complete.

But McLaughlin said government would not go down that road. Until a properly verified petition is submitted to Cabinet, he said, government need not respond.

“The legal advice is very clear,” the premier said. “The government should not and need not have any regard to what is now approaching a year-long process of signature collections. It has not risen, the petition, above that standard yet.”

Campaigners have expressed fears that government will seek to avoid a referendum by claiming the issue of the dock does not meet the definition of ‘national importance’ required by the Constitution before people-initiated referenda can be held.

Responding to further questions from McLean, the premier said government was not yet taking a position on whether the issue of the dock was one of ‘national importance.’

“The government is taking the appropriate legal advice,” he said, “and should a properly verified petition with the required number of signatures be presented, that issue will be considered properly and a position taken. I can say no more at this stage.”

Premier Alden McLaughlin

Outlining the next steps in the project, McLaughlin said the final bids were being evaluated and ranked by a team from the Major Projects Office, Port Authority of the Cayman Islands, the Ministry of Tourism and financial and technical consultants. A report will be submitted to the Public Procurement Committee, through the Central Tenders Committee, which will make a final recommendation to Cabinet.

McLaughlin said, “It has been a very long haul over many years, over three administrations and millions of dollars spent on expert reports, advice and time, to get to this point, but it is good for the Cayman Islands that we are here. At every point along the way, we have advised the public where we are.

“I and the deputy premier [Moses Kirkconnell] have repeatedly reminded the public that government needed to get to this final stage in the process in order to have final designs in hand, and having reached this point, I look forward to publicly unveiling the plans, including costs, as soon as the successful bidder has been identified.”

CPR Cayman said in an unrelated statement that it will submit its petition next week.

“Many people have expressed concerns about the verification process and we will seek greater clarification on all verification options that the Elections Office will provide for registered voters and all safeguards they will employ to ensure they are able to contact all persons who signed the petition,” it said.

1 COMMENT

  1. This is one of the worst floggings to the democratic spirit I’ve seen in this country. This situation reminds me very much of Moammar Gadhafi’s quote “There is no state with a democracy except Libya on the whole planet.”, and in relation to campaign promises, it is the epitome of Saddam Hussein’s elucidation, “Politics is when you say you are going to do one thing while intending to do another…”.

    To halt the procurement process for the period required for validation of the signatures would have exhibited respect for due process and the people of the country and it would have held the Constitution’s banner high. Once again our Constitution is being treated most irreverently. To see the Premier of the country and the Minister of Toursim pushing ahead to secure an expense and project that has triggered enough signatures as to put the Elections Office to work is a slap – no, a spit in the face.

    Alarmingly, although he is forging ahead against the signature verification process of a people’s initiated referandumn afforded under S.70 of the Constitution, he is the same Premier who quickly purchased a small lot of land known as Smith Barcadere as a reaction to public outcry by way of [unverified] signatures to an online petition. This is a shocking comparison.

    Although I know we need a port, I was concerned about what I saw as “cloak and dagger” issues: the process was not very clear, the reasonings were contradictory to the evidence, etc but this new declaration really makes this port project has increased my suspicions, concerns and awareness of the matter; why is so necessary to conclude the bidding process over upholding the constitutional process? Why is the Premier of the Cayman Islands so disrespectful to the Constitution of the Cayman Islands? Why is themost aacceptable procedure being avoided?

    The phraseology “legal advice” should not outweigh the Constitutional process and an elected representative’s desire to honour his people, his own electorate and the signatories to the petition.

    I think the best advice that should be given at this particular time is:

    a) Let the CPR and signatories be prepared to further their stance and force the process (although they shouldn’t have to)
    b) Electors should take note of this new disregard for the Constitutional process, of their wishes and their power by the current Premier, who is an elected representative. You need to vote wisely come 2021 and in order to do so you must have taken note of the past and current political reactions to know where to not place your “x”.

    I am appalled and greatly concerned about the attitude towards this process and the process itself, which is reminiscent of the recent usurpation of Parliamentary power by the judiciary, now being played out by the Assembly over the power of the people.

Comments are closed.