Attorney Leonardo Raznovich has said he is hoping the Privy Council will deliver its ruling in the Chantelle Day and Vickie Bodden Bush same-sex marriage case when the court resumes in October.

Raznovich, who is part of the legal team representing Day and Bodden Bush, told the Cayman Compass Tuesday that he believes the length of the panel’s deliberation is “out of the ordinary”.

It is nearing six months since legal arguments closed in the case and the Privy Council panel retired to deliberate on the issues highlighted by the couple seeking equal marriage rights in the Cayman Islands.

The Council is currently on summer recess and is expected to resume sittings the first week in October.

Also on the law lords’s decision list is a Bermudian case in which marriage rights are being challenged in that jurisdiction. That ruling is yet to be decided by the same panel of law lords that heard the Cayman case.

- Advertisement -
Leonardo Raznovich

“They [the Bermudian couple] have been sitting there for the last almost three years waiting for the Privy Council to make a decision, so I sympathise perhaps a little bit more because of the length [of time] they have [been] waiting… but that doesn’t mean that Vickie and Chantelle [are] not in… limbo… This is a big breach of human rights… this waiting for a decision,” Raznovich said.

The law lords have to decide on two issues in the Day/Bodden Bush case. One is whether Cayman’s Bill of Rights, as set out in the Constitution, provides for a right for same-sex couples to be married. The second issue is whether the Grand Court’s 2019 ruling, that changed the wording of the Marriage Law to legalise same-sex marriage, should be restored.

He said given the complexity of the case and the implications for not only Cayman, but also British Overseas Territories as a whole, he expected it would take some time to arrive at a decision, but not this long.

Raznovich said it is hard to determine which way the Council will go when it comes to either case.

“It would be very difficult to justify that the Privy Council will say yes to Bermuda for same-sex marriage and no to the Cayman Islands for same-sex marriage. Could that be a possible outcome? Yes, it could be. I would find it very difficult to find a justification for that. As a matter of principle, it would put the UK in a very awkward position,” Raznovich said.

He suggested one of the reasons for the delay is the same panel heard both cases. Adding to the complexity, he said, is that each case involved separate legal arguments but the rulings will both focus on whether same-sex marriage should be allowed.

“Each of the jurisdictions have a very high level of complexity and their judgment is going to make history one way or another. They’re going to become the Privy Council of the millennium, or they’re going to ratify themselves as a Victorian court,” he added.

Background to the case

Caymanian Day and her partner, Bodden Bush, were denied a marriage licence in 2018 after their application was rejected on the basis that the Marriage Law defines marriage as “the union between a man and a woman as husband and wife”.

In March 2019, the Grand Court found in their favour, ruling that preventing same-sex marriage was incompatible with Cayman’s Bill of Rights, as set out in the Constitution, which guarantees the right to private and family life.

Smellie used his powers under the Constitution to rewrite the Marriage Law, legalising same-sex marriage by defining marriage as the “union between two people as one another’s spouses”.

In November 2019, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal overturned that decision, ruling that the right to marry under the Constitution does not cover same-sex couples. However, the court also ordered government to act “expeditiously” to provide the couple with legal status equivalent to marriage.

The couple subsequently appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

- Advertisement -

Support local journalism. Subscribe to the all-access pass for the Cayman Compass.

Subscribe now


  1. Of course, Dr. Raznovich is right about the complicated nature of the arguments. But on the other hand, the case is a simple one: Are we a society that stands for fairness and equality — or not? Does each person get to decide for his/herself who they want as a partner — or is religion (which is the undeniable root of this fight) going to restrict the choice? There are those who say, “but the Bible says such and such.” That may be, but not only has the Bible demonstrated amazing elasticity in interpretation over the centuries and will surely continue to do so, there is the fact that an important tenet of our society is that people are free to follow whatever religion (or no religion) they desire — which means using such religion (if they choose it) to direct their own lives, BUT NOT THE LIVES OF OTHERS. Hopefully, the Privy Council will make the right and obvious decision — and soon. Chantelle and Vickie and countless others, deserve nothing less.

  2. A decision of this magnitude and one that will leave a lasting impact on the Cayman Islands for generations to come (good or bad – however you would like to see it), should be voted upon by the people of the island and not determined by the court.

    This is a social issue which society prefers to deal with legally in hopes of receiving a particular outcome. Is it too late for a referendum to be made? Let the people of the country decide what they want marriage/family life/values/tradition/future heritage for their country.