The Turks and Caicos Islands – under British direct rule since 2009 – will eliminate the practice of civil servant double-dipping; earning a pension while at the same time drawing a salary from government.
The change was just one of several announced Wednesday by Governor Ric Todd in attempts to resolve a number of funding problems within the Turks government’s non-contributory retirement scheme. Among those issues were administrative mistakes that led to $2 million in payment errors to pensioners, most of which would have to be “written off” by the government.
“Retired civil servants, employed after April 1992, who have been in receipt of $1.5 million of unlawfully paid gratuities and pensions under the Pensions Ordinance will not be penalised,” the announcement read. “Erroneous payments will be validated and written-off.”
Governor Todd said the Turks’ pension law going forward would end the payment of pensions to civil servants who are re-employed by the government after they have retired.
“The 2011 pension review identified cases of civil servants who had been re-employed by the Turks and Caicos Islands government after they had retired aged 55 and who were still collecting a pension,” the governor’s statement read. “Retired civil servants who were employed before April 1992 are entitled to the pension earned before that date under the government’s pension scheme. However, under Pensions Ordinance, they are not allowed to receive that pension is they are re-employed by government.
“The payment of their Turks and Caicos Islands government pension while they continue to be employed effectively doubles their income at a cost to the TCI taxpayer.”
The amended version of the ordinance will only allow payment of civil service pensions once those employees stop working for government entirely.
The Turks and Caicos Islands also intend to change the required retirement age from 55 to 60, according to Governor Todd.
In August 2009, the United Kingdom suspended the Turks and Caicos’ self-government after allegations of ministerial corruption.
The ‘double dipping’ issue has been raised in the Cayman Islands, which is also a British Overseas Territory, both in the context of the civil service and with currently serving members of the Legislative Assembly.
According to an employee survey done by the Portfolio of the Civil Service in 2009, there were 146 government employees who were Caymanians, 60 or older, who continued to work for the civil service past the typical age of retirement.
Under the current system, all of those workers would at least be eligible to retire and receive a monthly pension – if they were a part of the defined benefit retirement plan. However, if they were to continue in the civil service under a one-, two- or three-year contract, they could continue to receive a salary.
An open records request filed last year by the Caymanian Compass found that three Cayman Islands lawmakers, including Premier McKeeva Bush, George Town MLA Kurt Tibbetts and Bodden Town MLA Anthony Eden have all officially ‘retired’ and are now collecting pensions, as well as salaries as serving members of the LA.
Premier Bush has previously justified his and fellow politicians’ decision to receive their parliamentary pensions while still serving in the Legislative Assembly, saying by doing so, they save the country money.
“Opting to receive these benefits at this time, in effect, has closed the defined benefit plan to those of us who opted out, thereby reducing the future cost to government that would have resulted in some cases, from additional years of service specifically in my case, as well as the others, cost of living and any future salary increases. We can’t be paid on any of these things,” Mr. Bush said.
Related Videos









I still can’t figure out why the UK takes a position of discrimination where the Turks and Caicos and the Cayman Islands are concerned. Both these UK territories are playing from the pages of the same text book and what is happening in TCI is being duplicated in the Cayman Islands as well.Nothing different. The UK has some explaining to do, in the meantime can someone please explain the bureaucracy involved here, if you can find a label for it I mean, ’cause, its very confusing. Why beat one child for committing the same act that both children are guilty of? It seems quite fishy and tricky; and of course UNFAIR.
Is Cayman more important to the UK than TCI or are we lucky enough to escape their wrath?
So the premier is saying that double dipping saves money? I thought I heard it all.
How can double dipping save money when those retired persons from civil service should step aside take their pension and make room for our young people who should be promoted, climb up the corporate ladders of government and allow young people to join the civil service and succeed. How can they succeed if 146 people are standing in their way? 146 retirees?
This should change and it is costing the country a lot of money. Eventually the UK will have to do something about this. That’s why we’re broke!