PAC chairman defends witness list

The chairman of the Legislative Assembly’s Public Accounts Committee has defended his decision not to call certain witnesses who had direct knowledge of millions of dollars of government travel and hospitality expenditures that auditors said were questionable.  

George Town MLA Roy McTaggart said, on the advice of auditors – as is common practice – that he did not call either former Premier McKeeva Bush or Speaker of the House Juliana O’Connor-Connolly to testify before the committee last week, even though their former ministries bore the brunt of the criticism in the audit. The committee also did not call former ministry chief officers Kearney Gomez and Carson Ebanks, both of whom have since retired from the civil service.  

Mr. Bush, who is a member of the Public Accounts Committee, demanded that he be heard as a witness in the proceedings, to which Mr. McTaggart acquiesced. However, Ms. O’Connor-Connolly and the chief officers made no such demands and did not appear before the committee. Ms. O’Connor-Connolly has never responded to Cayman Compass requests for comment about the audit, which looked at, among other things, her ministry’s expenditures of $34,000 over three years on Cayman Brac hotel rooms and tens of thousands more on a trip to Doha, Qatar, for a postal services conference.  

The travel and hospitality audit looked at some 80 sample expenditures reviewed by the auditor general, about half of which lacked necessary supporting records to show what was being paid. In eight of the cases, no supporting records could be found.  

In the area of travel advances, some $32,000 provided by government to one employee had to be “written off” because the financial officer in charge of approving the expenses did not know whether the employee had traveled at all and, if he had, could not show what the money had been spent on. A total of $167,000 in travel advances to that particular ministry had to be written off because of similar issues with lack of supporting records. About $458,000 in travel and hospitality expenses by government were charged to credit cards that were later paid off by finance officers who had not received sufficient receipts to show what the cards had been used to pay for. One minister – who was not identified in the report – apparently self-approved $71,000 in such expenses. 

The audit found “very little information” about some $1.5 million government spent on hospitality during the period. 

The report did not mention any civil servants or elected ministers by name. However, Mr. Bush noted that most people familiar with Cayman politics would know who headed the ministries at the relevant time. “Who do you think the public is looking at?” he asked.  

Mr. McTaggart said he thought queries concerning why then-Minister O’Connor-Connolly, then-Premier Bush and the chief officers of their ministries weren’t called were valid. However, he said he did not believe it was the Public Accounts Committee’s role to fact-check the auditor general or to provide political theater for the general public.  

“Is it the responsibility of the PAC to understand or elicit that type of information?” Mr. McTaggart asked. “The report speaks for itself. The question for the PAC really is ‘what is the civil service doing to ensure these things don’t happen again?’ I don’t know that it is my responsibility or the PAC’s responsibility to sit down and hold an inquiry to determine whether what [Ms. O’Connor-Connolly] did was factual. It just turns into a political bum-fight. That’s not the purpose of the PAC.”  

Mr. McTaggart said his view is that the Public Accounts Committee should examine auditor’s reports objectively, make recommendations, and ensure those recommendations are carried out.  

“Personally, I think there’s still work to be done,” Mr. McTaggart said. “I questioned the deputy governor on [the existence of a hospitality policy for government] and he assured us it would shortly be rolled out. The premier has insisted that the travel policy … is to be adopted by ministers and councilors as well.”  

Some questions still linger about how the travel policy will be enforced if a government minister or MLA refuses to follow it. Planning Ministry Chief Officer Alan Jones told the Public Accounts Committee during his testimony that while a policy on reporting official travel expenses has been in effect in the civil service since mid-2013, the policy applies only voluntarily to government’s elected ministers. 

Mr. McTaggart said if he fell afoul of the travel policy, he would fully expect disciplinary action to come from the premier. Asked if he thought the political cost of doing that might be too high for the premier, he responded: “He could very well fire me. I’m responsible to him.”  

‘PAC failed’ 

Johann Moxam, past president of the Chamber of Commerce, said Thursday that the PAC and its members “failed” to use an opportunity to hold government officials and the former deputy premier to account.  

“The question to be answered by each member is why?” Mr. Moxam said. “When there are no questions asked nor consequences for mismanagement and waste of public funds by any government official, there can be no mystery to why nothing changes. Unfortunately, the charade of effective governance, transparency and accountability continues with the people and business community left to ultimately pay the costs. 

“Our leaders must move past the rhetoric and excuses. There must be one standard for accountability applicable to all persons in a leadership role in this country. We must not pick and choose who we hold accountable in government … there must be no exceptions.”  


Mr. McTaggart


  1. So presumably if, as Managing Partner, he had been informed by the auditors of KPMG that there were millions of dollars of insufficiently documented travel expenses for Partners and/or Associates, he would not have interrogated the staff involved and merely suggested that the company made sure it did not occur again.

  2. Mr McTaggart, you really do know better, so the above comments are inexcusable, you cannot pretend ignorance!
    The auditors function is to ask questions, examine records, make suggestions and report all of the findings. It is the executive body, that takes action, be it the company board, the partners, or in this case the government. The PAC is the part of government to examine the reports, and if necessary ask questions where ther is doubt. Here there is little doubt, but questions of those responsible must come from the PAC, and from the answers, come action by the departments.
    As I have said before, silence is not an option for the ministers that are responsible. Admittedly silence might be better where Bush is concerned, but at least his rantings show how little regard he has for adhering to what is expected of a minister.
    It is time McTaggart did what people expected when they elected someone of his experience.

Comments are closed.