Government in dark on full property value

Government in dark on full property value

The Cayman Islands government now has a good idea of what some of its properties and buildings may be worth, but it appears the full value of all lands the public sector owns remains out of reach at present. 

Officials with the auditor general’s office confirmed in a recent report that government’s 2013 land valuation – the first effort undertaken in more than 12 years – used appropriate methodologies in determining values for those properties. 

However, the valuation did not include properties owned by the separately operating statutory authorities and government companies. 

“Except for the Health Services Authority, statutory authority and government company properties had not been recently valued,” the auditor general’s report on government land management, released in late July, stated. The report added that an inventory of roads was not complete and that some 80 pieces of property classified as “heritage assets” had an arbitrary value of $0 assigned. 

Additionally, a 2011 review by the government Lands and Survey Department found that 279 parcels of Crown owned land – valued at about $60 million – were not being used in government operations. 

“Some of these properties constitute a liability to the government as they have been encroached upon or used for dumping trash,” the audit found. 

The Ministry of Planning is now evaluating the 279 properties, including 69 considered “available for sale” and will be making recommendations to Cabinet regarding how government can dispose of the land. 

“We noted that [government agencies] receive little direction as to what principles should be used to manage real property,” auditors reported. “We found no central manager in the government responsible for setting real property management policy overall.” 

Financing, insurance concerns 

One example of the problems of not having valuations for land and property assets was revealed in 2014 financial statements for the Cayman Turtle Farm. 

The West Bay tourism and research facility, as it has reported for the last few years, noted that it could not state a “recoverable amount” due – for insurance purposes – if its buildings or other assets were damaged “due to the size and complexity” of the Turtle Farm’s plant, equipment and exhibits. 

Prior to the 2013 government valuation, which has not been made public, government had not known its properties’ current values since 2001. Successive reviews by the Cayman Islands Auditor General’s Office have revealed the issue is one of the key problems in annual public sector financial reports being disclaimed. 

For instance, an audit evaluation for the government’s 2010/11 fiscal year received a disclaimer of opinion from Auditor General Alastair Swarbrick’s office – which means the financial statements for the entire public sector contained in government records could not be relied upon for accuracy – largely because government did not have “sufficient or appropriate evidence” of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. 

The lack of up-to-date values of relevant government properties can also impact a number of other areas of public finance, including whether the government is paying enough, or paying too much, for annual insurance premiums. Former Auditor General Dan Duguay flagged this as a problem in 2007 and recommended that government seek to address the issue immediately. Mr. Duguay said the last valuation of government properties was done in 2000, and stated his concern that government assets might be significantly under-insured at the date of his report in early 2007. 

The Cayman Turtle Farm is one of the separately operating government-owned companies for which property valuations have not been done recently, according to auditors. - PHOTO: JEWEL LEVY

The Cayman Turtle Farm is one of the separately operating government-owned companies for which property valuations have not been done recently, according to auditors. – PHOTO: JEWEL LEVY
0
0

NO COMMENTS

  1. Thank you Mr Swarbrick and Cayman Compass, for bringing this issue to the public attention. This is just despicable that property would be insured, but can”t find the true value no where. I wonder what is the reason for not having a value on these properties. Could it be possible for someone SPECIAL to buy these properties below market value. I know that people around the world has been able to protest and make Government do something, I think that the time has come for Caymanians rise up against this kind of disrespectful disgraceful behavior of GOVERNMENT. I smell a fox in the hen house.

    0

    0
  2. Sometimes I wonder if the government know about all the property they really have, because some of its properties are left to neglect with overgrown bush, people dumping trash, encroaching on them, raising goats in neighborhood areas. Take for instance the Cumber avenue area, where government own at least three pieces of property I am aware of. Only one piece is looked after, that is the Cumber avenue park. The other two pieces which is the "First Well" Heritage spot is left to neglect with overgrown bush and trash. This well served residence for drinking water and other house hold usage many many years a go when there was no cisterns or city water. Today it is still used by a few residents, but the well and property around it needs cleaning. It is a Heritage site and has been there for ever. Request have been made for some attendance but of course ignored. The government also owns a very large piece of wetland area, with a beautiful pond on Cumber Avenue. Some residents have added beautiful water lilies to the pond but by not being able to maintain around its bushy area; persons have encroached upon it building goat pens and dumping trash. The environment department is very aware of this and has had complaint by neighbors, however again requests has been ignored. I must freely say that if this was happening in other prestigious areas of the island, the environmental health department would have jumped on it quickly. Being a neighborhood watch dog is a dirty job but somebody has got to do it.

    0

    0
  3. These are the kind of things that get people fired in the private sector. While it continuously gets people reelected in the Public Sector.

    The CIG needs a Swarbrick on their side to keep track of their spending and financial assets. So at least they know what they own and maybe even why it was purchased.

    I think the word is called accountability..

    Who”s actually responsible for overall government finances and keep track of them in a tidy manor anyway? There should have been documented justification for each government expenditure as well each government asset purchased.

    Nothing that Swarbrick”s report discovered should have come as a surprise or not have a realistic and justifiable explanation or someone needs to replace the auditor responsible for keeping things in order.

    0

    0
  4. @ Ms Vargas, sometimes you have to do more than just be a watch dog, you have to publicly embarrass someone to get things done, when you have all your t”s crossed and i”s doted.

    0

    0