Let’s get right to the point. Yes, we all understand ‘innocent until proven guilty’ but where do we draw the line on allowing individuals out on bail? Would the courts allow bail for a suspected serial killer? If so, would that person not be watched carefully?
Tell me, please, what is more precious than our children? We allow a man facing numerous allegations out on bail, and what happens next is more sickening abuse that damages a child for a lifetime!
We also let suspects of a mass shooting out on bail. A shooting that happened at an event where crowds of entire families were gathered. What are our courts thinking to allow people suspected of highly dangerous behaviour out on the streets again? Yes, I understand they have ‘rights’ but when does the greater good of the community come into play?
Must we wait for more children to be sexually abused? Must we wait for another shooting at a community event? We all know that ankle monitors are cut off or removed, so that is not a deterrent.
We also need harsher sentences, and if the prison is overcrowded, then instead of putting up 10-storey buildings, please add on to the prison to make room for those that live for evil.
Janice Sanders
Related Videos
I completely agree and have been writing the same thing in these comments for years.
Not just allowed out to continue to molest children or rob with weapons but to intimidate witnesses.
It’s laughable that someone is let out on police bail, removes their ankle bracelet and the police then warn the public not to approach them as they are considered dangerous. If they are dangerous why were they let out in the first place?
The corollary is that there must be swift justice for those held on remand. Within 6 months at most.