Land acquisitions fair and equitable

I write to take issue with a couple of points made in the Compass editorial of 8 February in relation to a front page story of the same date about the acquisition of land for the expansion of the West Bay cemetery.

In your editorial you question the use of compulsory acquisition for the purpose of obtaining land for cemeteries, saying it is understandable in the case of acquiring land for roads. As you pointed out in your editorial, compulsory acquisition is used when the land is needed for public purposes. To take it a step further, compulsory acquisition is used to fulfil very important national needs. Anyone who does not equate the need of having sufficient cemetery space with the need of having a road certainly has a misplaced sense of national priorities. Just imagine what would happen if there is no cemetery space.

There is no need to ponder the effect of compulsory acquisition on future investment as your editorial did; there is more than adequate provision in the law to ensure that property owners are fairly compensated. Furthermore, compulsory acquisition is by no means unique to the Cayman Islands, and as I have noted, the measures required by our law are reasonable and fair.

On another point, Premier McKeeva Bush did not tell the audience on Monday night that he believes the land can be acquired for about $2 million as stated in the editorial. What he said was that there is a preliminary valuation of between $2.75 million and $3.25 million. In explaining the necessary steps if indeed compulsory acquisition must be used, Premier Bush said the parties would first attempt to negotiate the price between them. In the event that no agreement is reached the CIG would apply to the Grand Court to determine the amount of compensation to be paid. In its submission to the Court, the Lands & Survey Department would present its own valuation and two independent valuations and the owner would likely obtain his own valuations for submission. No one has said that we would expect to pay $2 million for this property of 11.7 acres.

I must also point out that the CIG remains open to acquiring other suitable property if it is available. In fact, Premier Bush told those in attendance on Monday night that if they know of alternative property that is suitable for a cemetery they should let the government know about it.

I trust that these corrections enable your readers to have a more accurate understanding of this important matter.

Charles Glidden

Press Secretary

to the Premier

If you value our service, if you have turned to us in the past few days or weeks for verified, factual updates, if you have watched our live streaming of press conferences or sent an article to a friend... please consider a donation. Quality local journalism was at risk before the coronavirus crisis. It is now deeply threatened. Even a small amount can go a long way to sustaining our mission of informing the public. We need our readers’ financial support now more than ever.



  1. ‘Furthermore, compulsory acquisition is by no means unique to the Cayman Islands, and as I have noted, the measures required by our law are reasonable and fair.’

    What is unique to the Cayman Islands is that the law reads that once Cabinet has decided that a piece of land is needed for public use, there is no recourse. The landowner just has to suck up the fact that their land is being taken and that they will be given a ‘fair and equitable’ price. Oh please, give us a break. How many people have had their land taken over by government for the public good and haven’t received a fair price or even payment?????

  2. Better yet, how many people have lost their land at the hands of government under the guise of government claims that they need the land i.e. compulsory acquisition, consequently, how many Caymanian landowners land has had their inheritance wind up into the hands of wealthy developers, the corruption committee needs to reopen some of these rotten cases.