The overarching theme to be gleaned from the newest solid waste management report is that the Cayman Islands government is in love with recycling — particularly, vast sections of previous reports.

So if any of the following editorial sounds familiar, pardon us. Think of it as a compulsory repurposing of previously existing material.

Here are the key points from the new 201-page report from U.K. consultant Amec Foster Wheeler:

  • The George Town Landfill will reach maximum capacity in about five years.
  • After that, a new landfill must be constructed on Grand Cayman.
  • The landfills on each of the three islands pose environmental and health risks, and should be closed and remediated.
  • Initiatives such as incineration, waste-to-energy, recycling and composting can serve to divert much waste from the new landfill.
  • “Mining” the existing landfill for waste-to-energy purposes won’t work.
  • Construction of the new facility will cost more than $106 million.
  • Over 25 years, cumulative operating costs will total more than $426 million.
  • Government does not have the resources to pay for the construction or operation of the project, and so must look to partner with the private sector.

In practical terms, the new report brings Cayman no nearer to solving our country’s waste management woes than we were three years ago, when the newly installed Progressives government summarily terminated the deal forged between the previous administration and the Dart Group to close, cap and remediate the George Town Landfill. The plan was to build a new landfill in far east Bodden Town (between two active quarries).

The kind way to label the new report is as an “exercise.” A less-than-charitable description is “fantasy.”

Even esteemed science fiction author H.G. Wells (“The Time Machine”) would have trouble with this plot: ferrying garbage from the Brac and Little Cayman over to Grand Cayman, where super-advanced technology diverts an astounding 95 percent of waste from being landfilled. (For perspective, after decades of effort, the city of San Francisco has a “landfill diversion rate” of 80 percent — the highest of any major city in North America.)

Of the $106 million in construction costs for the new waste facility, $60 million is earmarked for the waste-to-energy component, considered necessary because (we’d better tell you because you’d never guess) of “global warming.”

From the report: “[T]he continued landfilling of solid waste will result in an adverse contribution to global warming and as a consequence, to a rising sea level … Placing this in context and considering the low lying disposition of the Cayman Islands, the continued landfilling of solid waste would appear to be inconsistent with protecting the local environment and amenity to the Cayman Islands over the long term.”

Oh, mercy. The infinitesimal influence that Cayman may have on sea level rise (a millimeter? a micrometer?) certainly shouldn’t direct, or even influence, public policy — particularly when we don’t have the financial wherewithal to effect even a simple landfill solution.

Cutting through the verbiage, there are two components to the solid waste conundrum, one of which — the George Town Landfill — is quite complex, since it branches out into topics of health, the environment, tourism, aesthetics, finances, etc.

The other side — politics — is much simpler. The landfill issue presents a problem of trust for those elected officials who stood up during the 2013 campaign proclaiming “No dump in Bodden Town.” They assured voters they had an alternative solution. But they didn’t — and still don’t.

We wonder whether Premier Alden McLaughlin (representing George Town) would have gotten elected if, instead of joining in the chorus being chanted at the time by his colleagues to the east, he had campaigned on the following slogan:

“No dump in Bodden Town … Yes, dump in George Town!”

If you value our service, if you have turned to us in the past few days or weeks for verified, factual updates, if you have watched our live streaming of press conferences or sent an article to a friend... please consider a donation. Quality local journalism was at risk before the coronavirus crisis. It is now deeply threatened. Even a small amount can go a long way to sustaining our mission of informing the public. We need our readers’ financial support now more than ever.



  1. The construction of new facility would cost more than a $106 million , over 25 years cumulative operation cost will exceed $426 million .
    I think that the CI Government is scared to take all their garbage to the dump , because it would fill it up today.
    But if you use common sense , I think that it would be smarter to do the new facility.

    • Tom,
      Four years ago, Dart had a awesome Bodden Town design using 3 different member liners landfills and recycling sorting to reduce by over 50% that went into the landfill. Plus, in todays technology there are very efficient waste to energy systems for tires and plastics to be turned into diesel fuel.

  2. LOL, CIG citing ‘global warming’ as a consideration is a sick joke.

    Let’s take a few examples from their track record –

    Allowing CUC’s monopoly to block the introduction of alternate energy sources and rubber-stamping the ‘diesel is the only solution’ legislation for decades.

    Opposing the import of electric cars.

    Making no attempt to encourage the import of energy-efficient products to replace all the old-tech junk currently in use on these islands.

    Not introducing (or even considering introducing) emission tests into the annual vehicle inspections.

    And finally – letting the GT ‘landfill’ grow into ‘Mt Trashmore’ in the first place. How do they think that stinking mess got there in the first place? ‘It just growed’ only works if you’re misquoting Tom Sawyer!

    Talk about a dollar short and a day late!