The Grand Cayman Marriott Beach Resort has applied for a coastal works licence to re-establish the eroded beach in front of its Seven Mile Beach property.

The matter, which was submitted along with an application for $23 million renovation work at the hotel, was heard by the Central Planning Authority on Wednesday. Coastal works applications ultimately are decided by Cabinet, but the CPA and other government agencies act as advisory bodies on such issues.

The resort pointed out in its application that erosion had removed almost all the sand from the beachfront of the Marriott hotel, and the neighbouring South Bay Beach Club, Tamarind Bay and Plantation Village. The project would entail moving 100,000 square feet of sand from the sea floor, adjacent to the hotel, to the shore to rebuild the beach.

The cost of “renourishing” the beach, using what the company described as green “completely removable technology”, is likely to be about $950,000. That cost would be picked up by the owner of the Marriott – London and Regional Hotels – and the stratas of the neighbouring condos, but the applicant is asking that government waive duties for the project.

Matthew Manning, a consultant with AMR Consulting Engineers, which is heading up the project, said at Wednesday’s meeting that the Marriott is at a point where it is losing revenue because the hotel has no beach and ends up having to relocate tourists.

Manning said the Marriott had lost $4 million because of the erosion of the beach. “People are coming and being disappointed,” he added.

The CPA questioned the consultant on how the relocated-sand project will hold up to norwesters. He responded that the technology that will be used has been proven to have worked in other locations around the world.

Manning said part of the 18-month trial project would include the installation of “wave droids” to measure wave intensity. This will provide AMR with background readings to verify how to properly engage the beach-erosion problem, he said.

Manning said that unless data regarding the erosion of the beach is collected, there will never be a true solution to the problem.

The Department of Environment’s Technical Review Committee stated in the Coastal Works Review issued earlier this month that the project is wholly inconsistent with contemporary coastal-engineering practice for beach stabilisation.

“It will be ultimately deleterious to the Marriott, Seven Mile Beach, and the Cayman Islands. The proposed plan should be rejected by the Marriott and by the Government,” DoE stated.

DoE ended its report by saying that other solutions require a local strategic retreat, explaining, “Any opportunity to remove at least parts of an existing seawall to create additional upland for the beach is a means to create reliable beach recreation area and guests’ wading entry to the sea,” the DoE said.

“It exchanges some upland terrace areas for valuable beach area that does not otherwise rely upon seasonal fluctuations, beach nourishment, or structures. This option is becoming more increaingly adopted in the face of rising sea levels and diminishing natural beach sand supply.”

The hotel-renovation application encompasses all bedrooms and the beachside areas of the hotel. The application stated that the process would begin with the build-out of four sample/model rooms which would provide the blueprint for the full renovation of all 295 rooms, at a cost of $23 million.

If you value our service, if you have turned to us in the past few days or weeks for verified, factual updates, if you have watched our live streaming of press conferences or sent an article to a friend... please consider a donation. Quality local journalism was at risk before the coronavirus crisis. It is now deeply threatened. Even a small amount can go a long way to sustaining our mission of informing the public. We need our readers’ financial support now more than ever.



  1. This is long overdue. It is impossible to walk around Plantation
    Village most of the year and the other 3 properties about 6-7 months a year. All the condos south of Plantation Village are cut off from SMB. There is NO way in the world this should not only be approved but encouraged. If the government wanted to be proactive they would even pay for part of the cost since it is being done on the queens bottom

  2. I reported on these beach erosion issues on SMB in Net News back in 2007 so it’s nothing new. Based on what we were told at the time it’s a very simple problem – the developments don’t have proper set back from the sea. In plain English they were allowed to build too darn close to the beach. If you want to see where all that sand has gone try, as I did, diving what’s left of the reefs out there – it’s not a pretty sight. Back then the conclusion was the only real way to sort this out is to demolish the buildings and rebuild them further back but instead the development has carried on.

  3. The nearshore submerged reefs constructed of reef balls were intended to mitigate erosion conditions at the Marriott. Apparently they weren’t successful. Hard structures manipulate the sediment budget, but don’t manufacture sand. The beach management recommendations regarding monitoring, sedimentology, and nourishment in my April 1988 investigation of the beach erosion conditions of the Seven Mile Beach are still relevant today.